• Luca Fairgray has been sentenced to 4.5 years in prison for crimes against a 13-year-old girl.
• He was found guilty of three charges of sexual conduct with a young person in February.
• Fairgray has previous convictions for sexual assaults against six teenage girls, including rape.

Serial sex offender Luca Fairgray has been jailed for 4.5 years for crimes against a 13-year-old girl.

Sentencing Judge Evangelos Thomas said the victim would be dealing with the effects of Fairgray’s offending for the rest of her life.

“You claim recognition for remorse, you testified at trial, I saw none,” Judge Thomas said.

Fairgray, 22, was found guilty of three charges of sexual conduct with a young person by a jury in February.

Unbeknown to the jury, Fairgray had previously been convicted of 10 charges for assaults against six teenage girls, including rape and sexual conduct with a person under 16.

He had interim name suppression in relation to those convictions when he offended against the 13-year-old.

Fairgray arrived at today’s sentencing in the Auckland District Court wearing a white T-shirt with a light-coloured, short-sleeved shirt on top.

Prosecutor Robin McCoubrey said the aggravating features of Fairgray’s crimes were, in particular, the length of time of his offending and the vulnerability of the victim.

In a victim impact statement, read by prosecutor Rosemary Hayden, the survivor said what happened damaged her relationship with her mum and brother.

Since the offending, she has not been able to attend school and she struggles to trust people.

• Serial sex attacker’s identity revealed, offended again as victims battled to name him
• Auckland man found guilty of charges after sex with 13-year-old
• Man who had sex with minor tells jury she had the ‘body of a 16-year-old’
• Man accused of sex with minor jumped out of window and hid from police, jury told
• 'I am 15': Man who had sex with 13yo allegedly lied about his age while procuring abortion

She expressed frustration about Fairgray using his autism diagnosis, which they both have, to explain his actions.

Defence lawyer Susan Gray said it has been a “difficult and sad case” for everyone involved.

She submitted that 30 months would be an appropriate sentence starting point.

Gray said an uplift for his previous offending must be imposed in a moderate manner so he is not “punished twice” for the same offending.

She told the court it was his first time in prison and he was not “accustomed to prison” and vulnerable.

Gray also sought a reduction for remorse.

Judge Thomas said: “You have offended in a similar way before. You have offended this time, at the first moment you really had an opportunity to.

”She doesn’t know all the consequences of this on her, she’s going to discover some of the consequences on her as she gets older."

The judge said the victim would be dealing with the effects of Fairgray’s offending “probably, in one way or another, for most of her adult life”.

For each sexual connection charge, Judge Thomas sentenced Fairgray to 4.5 years in prison and three months for a separate cannabis supply charge, to be served concurrently.

“Given the sentence I will impose you will be automatically registered on the child sex offender register.”

Accused met girl on video chat website

During the trial, it was not disputed the pair had sex or that she had been 13, but the defence argued unsuccessfully that the complainant had said she was 16, and Fairgray believed her.

The defendant and the girl met on a video chat website in June 2023 before moving to Snapchat.

She alleged she told Fairgray she was 13 during a video call before meeting in person.

The pair dated for months and had sex on multiple occasions, both parties accepted.

The complainant became pregnant and an abortion clinic recorded a person called “Luke” made the girl an appointment and gave Fairgray’s number.

Fairgray gave the centre her correct date of birth and lied about his own age, saying he was 15. His lawyer said he did so because by that point he knew she was only 13.

After the abortion, it was alleged by the Crown that further sexual activity happened at least once.

The next month the girl went missing temporarily and police became aware of the relationship between the pair.

His neurodiversity featured heavily in this trial and Gray told the jury that failing to consider his autism would be discriminating against him based on his disability.

The Crown accepted he struggled in some social situations but otherwise was intelligent and capable.

“Autism is not a defence in these charges,” prosecutor Pip McNabb said.

Usually, the burden to prove charges lies with the prosecution. However, in this case, the defence did not contest that the complainant was 13 when the sexual conduct occurred.

Fairgray pleaded guilty at the start of his trial to one charge of supplying cannabis.

Katie Harris is an Auckland-based journalist who covers issues including sexual assault, workplace misconduct, media, crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2020.