ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Listen to NAME OF STATION
Up next
Listen live on
ZB

'Highly classified information' closes door on espionage hearing

Author
Open Justice,
Publish Date
Wed, 30 Mar 2022, 3:04pm
A pre-trial hearing for a solider accused of espionage has concluded for the day. Photo / NZDF
A pre-trial hearing for a solider accused of espionage has concluded for the day. Photo / NZDF

'Highly classified information' closes door on espionage hearing

Author
Open Justice,
Publish Date
Wed, 30 Mar 2022, 3:04pm

Highly classified information has kept secret much of the details of a pre-trial hearing for a soldier accused of espionage. 

It's the first time such a charge has been laid against a New Zealand soldier in recent history. 

The soldier faces 17 charges including multiple counts of espionage, attempted espionage, accessing a computer system for a dishonest purpose and possessing objectionable material. 

He also faces one charge of doing an act likely to prejudice service discipline or bring discredit to the service, one charge of negligently failing to perform a duty and four charges of failing to comply with written orders. 

The soldier is accused of being a member of two far-right groups, and possessing a copy of the March 15 terror attacks, according to charging documents previously obtained by RNZ. 

He has been on military arrest and was due to appear today for the second pre-trial court-martial in a case that has garnered media attention globally. 

The soldier, who has interim name suppression, was arrested in December 2019 after a joint investigation by police and the Defence Force. 

He was due to appear before Chief Judge Kevin Riordan at Linton Military Camp today, however the 28-year-old's attendance was excused for a number of reasons including issues surrounding his mental health. 

The hearing was to determine what evidence needed to be disclosed to his defence lawyers ahead of the trial. 

It related to the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service and the information proposed for disclosure was highly classified. 

The hearing was adjourned to manage that classified information but reporters, attending virtually, were asked to leave first. 

By law, reporters can be asked to leave a court if security levels exceed a certain threshold, namely when discussions are centred around national security. 

No new date has been set down in the case which was delayed from last year. 

- by Hazel Osborne, Open Justice

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you